Belgium-Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture

Belgium-Luxembourg
43.97 million kg
in 1999
Rwanda
41.65 million kg
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
80th
Rwanda rank
82nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Rwanda
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 43.97 million kg against 41.65 million kg in Rwanda, a difference of 2.32 million kg.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 80th and Rwanda ranks 82nd of 190 countries.

Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 26.95 million kg 18.79 million kg 8.15 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1970s 31.20 million kg 22.94 million kg 8.26 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 34.58 million kg 18.37 million kg 16.21 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 41.36 million kg 15.17 million kg 26.19 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture, Belgium-Luxembourg or Rwanda?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 43.97 million kg against 41.65 million kg in Rwanda as of 1999.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture between Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda?
2.32 million kg, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 80th and Rwanda ranks 82nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/rwanda/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).