Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches

Australia and New Zealand
549.46 million kg
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3.78 billion kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
6th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 3.78 billion kg against 549.46 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3.23 billion kg.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 6.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 6th of 190 countries.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 341.89 million kg 1.44 billion kg 1.10 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1970s 543.39 million kg 1.63 billion kg 1.09 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 444.10 million kg 1.80 billion kg 1.36 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 478.11 million kg 2.05 billion kg 1.57 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 514.53 million kg 2.48 billion kg 1.97 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 505.06 million kg 3.14 billion kg 2.64 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 482.37 million kg 3.68 billion kg 3.20 billion kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture that leaches, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 3.78 billion kg against 549.46 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture that leaches between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
3.23 billion kg, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure left on pasture that leaches?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-left-on-pasture-that-leaches-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-left-on-pasture-that-leaches-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).