Australia vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Australia
154.51 million kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
160.65 million kg
in 2023
Australia rank
17th
Uzbekistan rank
16th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Australia
  • Uzbekistan
50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M150.0M175.0M196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 160.65 million kg against 154.51 million kg in Australia, a difference of 6.14 million kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 129.40 million kg 56.93 million kg 72.47 million kg Australia
2000s 139.44 million kg 67.27 million kg 72.17 million kg Australia
2010s 138.68 million kg 127.10 million kg 11.58 million kg Australia
2020s 131.06 million kg 156.41 million kg 25.34 million kg Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Australia or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 160.65 million kg against 154.51 million kg in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Australia and Uzbekistan?
6.14 million kg, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Uzbekistan rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Australia ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia/uzbekistan/">Australia vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).