Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management

Barbados
3,137 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
3,974 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
179th
Equatorial Guinea rank
176th

Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management over time

  • Barbados
  • Equatorial Guinea
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3,974 kg against 3,137 kg in Barbados, a difference of 837 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 179th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 176th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 5,246 kg 2,010 kg 3,236 kg Barbados
1970s 5,290 kg 2,724 kg 2,566 kg Barbados
1980s 5,886 kg 3,184 kg 2,702 kg Barbados
1990s 9,919 kg 3,505 kg 6,414 kg Barbados
2000s 4,378 kg 3,637 kg 741.63 kg Barbados
2010s 3,150 kg 3,795 kg 644.97 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3,149 kg 3,946 kg 797.32 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy β€” manure management, Barbados or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3,974 kg against 3,137 kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy β€” manure management between Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
837 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for cattle, non-dairy β€” manure management?
Barbados ranks 179th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 176th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/equatorial-guinea/">Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).