Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Congo
258,087 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
313,765 kg
in 2023
Congo rank
155th
Eswatini rank
153rd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 313,765 kg against 258,087 kg in Congo, a difference of 55,678 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 206 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 21,544 kg 322,134 kg 300,590 kg Eswatini
1970s 39,139 kg 384,357 kg 345,217 kg Eswatini
1980s 51,709 kg 395,737 kg 344,028 kg Eswatini
1990s 54,905 kg 419,892 kg 364,988 kg Eswatini
2000s 149,775 kg 353,118 kg 203,343 kg Eswatini
2010s 265,849 kg 354,503 kg 88,654 kg Eswatini
2020s 260,034 kg 327,543 kg 67,508 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 313,765 kg against 258,087 kg in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Congo and Eswatini?
55,678 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Congo ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).