Czechoslovakia vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Czechoslovakia
116.22 million kg
in 1992
Latin America and the Caribbean
166.56 million kg
in 2023
Czechoslovakia rank
20th
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
23rd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 166.56 million kg against 116.22 million kg in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 50.34 million kg.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 1.4 times Czechoslovakia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 20th and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 23rd of 190 countries.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia Latin America and the Caribbean Difference Ahead
1960s 98.90 million kg 70.47 million kg 28.43 million kg Czechoslovakia
1970s 106.10 million kg 91.05 million kg 15.05 million kg Czechoslovakia
1980s 129.70 million kg 109.15 million kg 20.55 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 127.37 million kg 118.00 million kg 9.37 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Czechoslovakia or Latin America and the Caribbean?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 166.56 million kg against 116.22 million kg in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Czechoslovakia and Latin America and the Caribbean?
50.34 million kg, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Latin America and the Caribbean?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and Latin America and the Caribbean rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Czechoslovakia ranks 20th and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/czechoslovakia/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/czechoslovakia/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/">Czechoslovakia vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).