Ecuador vs Georgia: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time
- Ecuador
- Georgia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.15 million kg against 1.05 million kg in Georgia, a difference of 101,580 kg.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 112th and Georgia ranks 115th of 188 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.68 million kg | 1.13 million kg | 548,344 kg | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1.57 million kg | 1.16 million kg | 409,778 kg | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1.46 million kg | 1.23 million kg | 229,733 kg | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1.25 million kg | 1.12 million kg | 130,898 kg | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Ecuador or Georgia?
- Ecuador, at 1.15 million kg against 1.05 million kg in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Ecuador and Georgia?
- 101,580 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
- Ecuador ranks 112th and Georgia ranks 115th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).