Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Ecuador
1.15 million kg
in 2023
Israel
1.16 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
112th
Israel rank
111th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Ecuador
  • Israel
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1.16 million kg against 1.15 million kg in Ecuador, a difference of 2,870 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 112th and Israel ranks 111th of 190 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 642,840 kg 372,416 kg 270,424 kg Ecuador
1970s 781,810 kg 447,040 kg 334,770 kg Ecuador
1980s 1.20 million kg 526,344 kg 672,989 kg Ecuador
1990s 1.64 million kg 625,432 kg 1.02 million kg Ecuador
2000s 1.57 million kg 652,635 kg 918,128 kg Ecuador
2010s 1.46 million kg 912,710 kg 551,640 kg Ecuador
2020s 1.25 million kg 1.10 million kg 154,938 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Ecuador or Israel?
Israel, at 1.16 million kg against 1.15 million kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Ecuador and Israel?
2,870 kg, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Israel rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Ecuador ranks 112th and Israel ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/israel/">Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).