Ecuador vs Mauritania: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Ecuador
1.15 million kg
in 2023
Mauritania
1.23 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
112th
Mauritania rank
109th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 1.23 million kg against 1.15 million kg in Ecuador, a difference of 72,460 kg.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 112th and Mauritania ranks 109th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 642,840 kg 1.60 million kg 961,684 kg Mauritania
1970s 781,810 kg 909,672 kg 127,862 kg Mauritania
1980s 1.20 million kg 808,198 kg 391,135 kg Ecuador
1990s 1.64 million kg 771,283 kg 871,601 kg Ecuador
2000s 1.57 million kg 937,771 kg 632,992 kg Ecuador
2010s 1.46 million kg 1.15 million kg 318,473 kg Ecuador
2020s 1.25 million kg 1.23 million kg 25,712 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 1.23 million kg against 1.15 million kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Ecuador and Mauritania?
72,460 kg, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Ecuador ranks 112th and Mauritania ranks 109th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).