Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management

Micronesia (Federated States of)
81,906 kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
160.65 million kg
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
19th
Uzbekistan rank
16th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Uzbekistan
050.0M100.0M150.0M199120072023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 160.65 million kg against 81,906 kg in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 160.57 million kg.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1,961.4 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 20 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 65,991 kg 56.93 million kg 56.86 million kg Uzbekistan
2000s 65,948 kg 67.27 million kg 67.20 million kg Uzbekistan
2010s 75,818 kg 127.10 million kg 127.02 million kg Uzbekistan
2020s 80,705 kg 156.41 million kg 156.33 million kg Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure management, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 160.65 million kg against 81,906 kg in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure management between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
160.57 million kg, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure management?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia-federated-states-of/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia-federated-states-of/uzbekistan/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Uzbekistan: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).