Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
33.42 million An
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
289.82 million An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 289.82 million An against 33.42 million An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 256.40 million An.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 8.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 190 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 20.79 million An 115.08 million An 94.28 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 33.05 million An 129.96 million An 96.91 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 27.01 million An 137.54 million An 110.53 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 29.08 million An 156.16 million An 127.08 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 31.29 million An 188.07 million An 156.77 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 30.72 million An 239.97 million An 209.25 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 29.34 million An 282.40 million An 253.06 million An Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 289.82 million An against 33.42 million An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
256.40 million An, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).