Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks

Ethiopia PDR
27.28 million An
in 1992
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
224.07 million An
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
15th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
12th

Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 224.07 million An against 27.28 million An in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 196.79 million An.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 8.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th of 206 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 22.95 million An 40.46 million An 17.51 million An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 23.24 million An 47.89 million An 24.65 million An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 23.95 million An 54.77 million An 30.82 million An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 26.68 million An 62.47 million An 35.79 million An Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — stocks, Ethiopia PDR or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 224.07 million An against 27.28 million An in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — stocks between Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
196.79 million An, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — stocks?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-stocks/ethiopia-pdr/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-stocks/ethiopia-pdr/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia PDR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).