United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Cattle — Share in total livestock

United Republic of Tanzania
81.63 %LSU
in 2023
Uruguay
85.65 %LSU
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st
Uruguay rank
6th

Cattle — Share in total livestock over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Uruguay
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 85.65 %LSU against 81.63 %LSU in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 4.02 %LSU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 6th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 83.85 %LSU 69.46 %LSU 14.39 %LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 84.73 %LSU 76.76 %LSU 7.97 %LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 83.01 %LSU 72.77 %LSU 10.24 %LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 80.15 %LSU 73.02 %LSU 7.12 %LSU United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 81.02 %LSU 83.97 %LSU 2.95 %LSU Uruguay
2010s 81.28 %LSU 86.22 %LSU 4.94 %LSU Uruguay
2020s 81.57 %LSU 85.4 %LSU 3.82 %LSU Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — share in total livestock, United Republic of Tanzania or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 85.65 %LSU against 81.63 %LSU in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — share in total livestock between United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay?
4.02 %LSU, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay rank globally for cattle — share in total livestock?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 6th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Share in total livestock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Cattle — Share in total livestock. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-share-in-total-livestock/united-republic-of-tanzania/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-share-in-total-livestock/united-republic-of-tanzania/uruguay/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Cattle — Share in total livestock</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Share in total livestock
Unit
%LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,793 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.