Belgium vs Iraq: Cattle — Stocks
Cattle — Stocks over time
- Belgium
- Iraq
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2.25 million An against 2.15 million An in Iraq, a difference of 98,140 An.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 89th and Iraq ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.77 million An | 1.53 million An | 1.24 million An | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2.47 million An | 2.32 million An | 149,449 An | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2.29 million An | 2.08 million An | 211,245 An | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, Belgium or Iraq?
- Belgium, at 2.25 million An against 2.15 million An in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks between Belgium and Iraq?
- 98,140 An, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iraq?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Iraq rank globally for cattle — stocks?
- Belgium ranks 89th and Iraq ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).