China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cattle — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,560 An
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2,170 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
183rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
180th

Cattle — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 2,170 An against 1,560 An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 610 An.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.4 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 180th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 13,668 An 7,072 An 6,596 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 10,808 An 7,110 An 3,698 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 3,040 An 7,290 An 4,250 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 1,682 An 6,180 An 4,498 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 1,525 An 5,270 An 3,745 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 1,623 An 3,826 An 2,203 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 1,563 An 2,357 An 794 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 2,170 An against 1,560 An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
610 An, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for cattle — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 180th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cattle — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,918 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).