Estonia vs Libya: Cattle — Stocks
Cattle — Stocks over time
- Estonia
- Libya
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 241,360 An against 211,263 An in Libya, a difference of 30,097 An.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 147th and Libya ranks 150th of 206 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 444,009 An | 148,125 An | 295,884 An | Estonia |
| 2000s | 251,420 An | 157,242 An | 94,178 An | Estonia |
| 2010s | 248,644 An | 205,195 An | 43,448 An | Estonia |
| 2020s | 248,770 An | 211,263 An | 37,507 An | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, Estonia or Libya?
- Estonia, at 241,360 An against 211,263 An in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks between Estonia and Libya?
- 30,097 An, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Libya rank globally for cattle — stocks?
- Estonia ranks 147th and Libya ranks 150th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).