Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks

Sub-Saharan Africa
351.07 million An
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
37.91 million An
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Cattle — Stocks over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 351.07 million An against 37.91 million An in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 313.15 million An.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 9.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 33 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 117.67 million An 9.12 million An 108.55 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 134.97 million An 11.23 million An 123.74 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 151.54 million An 12.85 million An 138.69 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 169.81 million An 14.01 million An 155.79 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 209.14 million An 17.89 million An 191.25 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 287.58 million An 25.94 million An 261.63 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 340.58 million An 35.85 million An 304.73 million An Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — stocks, Sub-Saharan Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 351.07 million An against 37.91 million An in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — stocks between Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
313.15 million An, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — stocks?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-2/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-2/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,918 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).