Belarus vs Costa Rica: Cattle — Stocks, per capita
Belarus
0.4573 An per person
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.4303 An per person
in 2023
Belarus rank
21st
Costa Rica rank
23rd
Cattle — Stocks, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.4573 An per person against 0.4303 An per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.027 An per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 21st and Costa Rica ranks 23rd of 167 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5343 An per person | 0.4897 An per person | 0.0446 An per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.4181 An per person | 0.2878 An per person | 0.1303 An per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.4542 An per person | 0.292 An per person | 0.1621 An per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.4564 An per person | 0.3742 An per person | 0.0821 An per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, per capita, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Belarus, at 0.4573 An per person against 0.4303 An per person in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks, per capita between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 0.027 An per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for cattle — stocks, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Costa Rica ranks 23rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.