Belarus vs Eswatini: Cattle — Stocks, per capita
Belarus
0.4573 An per person
in 2023
Eswatini
0.417 An per person
in 2023
Belarus rank
21st
Eswatini rank
24th
Cattle — Stocks, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.4573 An per person against 0.417 An per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0403 An per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belarus ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 24th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5343 An per person | 0.6568 An per person | 0.1224 An per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.4181 An per person | 0.5374 An per person | 0.1192 An per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.4542 An per person | 0.5079 An per person | 0.0538 An per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.4564 An per person | 0.4409 An per person | 0.0155 An per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, per capita, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 0.4573 An per person against 0.417 An per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks, per capita between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 0.0403 An per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for cattle — stocks, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 24th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.