Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Cattle — Stocks, per capita
Luxembourg
0.2754 An per person
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.2751 An per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
41st
New Caledonia rank
42nd
Cattle — Stocks, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.2754 An per person against 0.2751 An per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0003 An per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 41st and New Caledonia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4186 An per person | 0.4209 An per person | 0.0023 An per person | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.35 An per person | 0.3143 An per person | 0.0358 An per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.2888 An per person | 0.2819 An per person | 0.007 An per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, per capita, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- Luxembourg, at 0.2754 An per person against 0.2751 An per person in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks, per capita between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 0.0003 An per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for cattle — stocks, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 41st and New Caledonia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.