China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,014 LSU
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
733 LSU
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
183rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
184th

Cattle — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1,014 LSU against 733 LSU in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 281 LSU.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 184th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 8,884 LSU 1,736 LSU 7,148 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 7,025 LSU 1,284 LSU 5,741 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,976 LSU 1,600 LSU 376 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 1,093 LSU 1,888 LSU 794.2 LSU Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 991.25 LSU 1,588 LSU 596.25 LSU Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1,055 LSU 619 LSU 435.75 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,016 LSU 721.12 LSU 294.99 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sao Tome and Principe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1,014 LSU against 733 LSU in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
281 LSU, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cattle — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 184th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,793 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.