Belgium vs Kiribati: Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area
Belgium
0.0%
in 2025
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2025
Belgium rank
85th
Kiribati rank
85th
Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area over time
- Belgium
- Kiribati
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kiribati ahead.
Belgium ranks 85th and Kiribati ranks 85th of 228 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | Belgium |
| 2010s | -0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | -0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area as a share of forest area, Belgium or Kiribati?
- Belgium, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area as a share of forest area between Belgium and Kiribati?
- 0.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kiribati?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Kiribati rank globally for annual change in forest area as a share of forest area?
- Belgium ranks 85th and Kiribati ranks 85th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.