Bhutan vs North Macedonia: Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area
Bhutan
-0.3%
in 2025
North Macedonia
-0.3%
in 2025
Bhutan rank
184th
North Macedonia rank
183rd
Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area over time
- Bhutan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports -0.3% against -0.3% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 184th and North Macedonia ranks 183rd of 228 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.6% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | -0.3% | -0.1% | 0.2% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area as a share of forest area, Bhutan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at -0.3% against -0.3% in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area as a share of forest area between Bhutan and North Macedonia?
- 0.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and North Macedonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and North Macedonia rank globally for annual change in forest area as a share of forest area?
- Bhutan ranks 184th and North Macedonia ranks 183rd of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area as a share of forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.