Australia vs South Sudan: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Australia
0.0%
in 2025
South Sudan
0.0%
in 2025
Australia rank
76th
South Sudan rank
78th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Australia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.9 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Sudan ahead.
Australia ranks 76th and South Sudan ranks 78th of 227 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and South Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | -0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Australia or South Sudan?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Australia and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Sudan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Australia and South Sudan rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Australia ranks 76th and South Sudan ranks 78th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.