Belgium vs Faroe Islands: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Belgium
0.0%
in 2025
Faroe Islands
0.0%
in 2025
Belgium rank
84th
Faroe Islands rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Belgium
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Belgium ranks 84th and Faroe Islands ranks 84th of 227 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Faroe Islands |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | Belgium |
| 2010s | -0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | -0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Belgium or Faroe Islands?
- Belgium, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Faroe Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Belgium and Faroe Islands?
- 0.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Faroe Islands?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Faroe Islands rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Belgium ranks 84th and Faroe Islands ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.