Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Equatorial Guinea
-0.3%
in 2025
Eswatini
-0.3%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
187th
Eswatini rank
186th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -0.3% against -0.3% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Eswatini ranks 186th of 227 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3% | -0.3% | 0.0% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | -0.3% | -0.3% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.3% | -0.3% | 0.0% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -0.3% | -0.3% | 0.0% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at -0.3% against -0.3% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Eswatini ranks 186th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.