Faroe Islands vs Kiribati: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Faroe Islands
0.0%
in 2025
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2025
Faroe Islands rank
84th
Kiribati rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Faroe Islands
- Kiribati
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Faroe Islands ranks 84th and Kiribati ranks 84th of 227 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Faroe Islands or Kiribati?
- Faroe Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Faroe Islands and Kiribati?
- 0.0%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Kiribati?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Faroe Islands and Kiribati rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Faroe Islands ranks 84th and Kiribati ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.