Kazakhstan vs United Kingdom: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Kazakhstan
0.4%
in 2025
United Kingdom
0.4%
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
24th
United Kingdom rank
25th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 24th and United Kingdom ranks 25th of 227 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | -0.2% | 0.4% | 0.6% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Kazakhstan or United Kingdom?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4% against 0.4% in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Kazakhstan and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and United Kingdom?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and United Kingdom rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 24th and United Kingdom ranks 25th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.