Kiribati vs New Caledonia: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2025
New Caledonia
0.0%
in 2025
Kiribati rank
84th
New Caledonia rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Kiribati
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 84th of 227 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Kiribati or New Caledonia?
- Kiribati, at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Kiribati and New Caledonia?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Caledonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and New Caledonia rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Kiribati ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.