Luxembourg vs Saint Barthelemy: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Luxembourg
0.0%
in 2025
Saint Barthelemy
0.0%
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
84th
Saint Barthelemy rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Saint Barthelemy
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Barthelemy, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 84th and Saint Barthelemy ranks 84th of 227 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Saint Barthelemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Luxembourg or Saint Barthelemy?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Barthelemy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Luxembourg and Saint Barthelemy?
- 0.0%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Saint Barthelemy?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Saint Barthelemy rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 84th and Saint Barthelemy ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.