Mauritius vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
Mauritius
0.0%
in 2025
St. Kitts and Nevis
0.0%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
84th
St. Kitts and Nevis rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- Mauritius
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in St. Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 84th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th of 227 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and St. Kitts and Nevis in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | -0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | -0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | -0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | St. Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, Mauritius or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritius, at 0.0% against 0.0% in St. Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between Mauritius and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- Mauritius ranks 84th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.