New Caledonia vs Sweden: Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita
New Caledonia
0.0%
in 2025
Sweden
0.0%
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
84th
Sweden rank
84th
Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita over time
- New Caledonia
- Sweden
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 84th and Sweden ranks 84th of 227 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.0% | -0.0% | 0.0% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.6% | -0.0% | 0.7% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | -0.0% | 0.0% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita, New Caledonia or Sweden?
- New Caledonia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita between New Caledonia and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do New Caledonia and Sweden rank globally for annual change in forest area vs. gdp per capita?
- New Caledonia ranks 84th and Sweden ranks 84th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.