Burundi vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded … annual

Burundi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Burundi rank
178th
New Caledonia rank
178th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded … annual over time

  • Burundi
  • New Caledonia
-100-50050100199220042016

How they compare

Burundi currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Burundi ranks 178th and New Caledonia ranks 178th of 197 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s 50 % change on previous year -41.29 % change on previous year 91.29 % change on previous year Burundi
2010s -20 % change on previous year -20 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported, Burundi or New Caledonia?
Burundi, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2016.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported between Burundi and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and New Caledonia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2016.
How do Burundi and New Caledonia rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported?
Burundi ranks 178th and New Caledonia ranks 178th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-domestic-forest-area-vs-deforestation-embedded-in-imported-goods-annual-growth/burundi/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-domestic-forest-area-vs-deforestation-embedded-in-imported-goods-annual-growth/burundi/new-caledonia/">Burundi vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,107 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.