Chile vs Zimbabwe: Charcoal — Energy consumption
Chile
4,511 TJ
in 2020
Zimbabwe
4,682 TJ
in 2024
Chile rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
54th
Charcoal — Energy consumption over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4,682 TJ against 4,511 TJ in Chile, a difference of 171 TJ.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,325 TJ | 413 TJ | 6,912 TJ | Chile |
| 2000s | 7,773 TJ | 1,394 TJ | 6,379 TJ | Chile |
| 2010s | 5,182 TJ | 4,194 TJ | 988.35 TJ | Chile |
| 2020s | 4,511 TJ | 4,621 TJ | 110.45 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charcoal — energy consumption, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4,682 TJ against 4,511 TJ in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charcoal — energy consumption between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 171 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for charcoal — energy consumption?
- Chile ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Charcoal — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.