Kiribati vs Malta: Charcoal — Energy consumption
Charcoal — Energy consumption over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 13.28 TJ against 9.73 TJ in Malta, a difference of 3.55 TJ.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.4 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 165th of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.38 TJ | 5.53 TJ | 1.85 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 8.94 TJ | 7.49 TJ | 1.45 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 11.24 TJ | 8.86 TJ | 2.38 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 12.94 TJ | 9.73 TJ | 3.21 TJ | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charcoal — energy consumption, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 13.28 TJ against 9.73 TJ in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charcoal — energy consumption between Kiribati and Malta?
- 3.55 TJ, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for charcoal — energy consumption?
- Kiribati ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 165th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Charcoal — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.