Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Charcoal — Energy consumption
Charcoal — Energy consumption over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4,682 TJ against 3,729 TJ in Namibia, a difference of 953 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Namibia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59 TJ | 413 TJ | 354 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,661 TJ | 1,394 TJ | 266.38 TJ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1,853 TJ | 4,194 TJ | 2,341 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3,341 TJ | 4,607 TJ | 1,266 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charcoal — energy consumption, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4,682 TJ against 3,729 TJ in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charcoal — energy consumption between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 953 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for charcoal — energy consumption?
- Namibia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Charcoal — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.