Peru vs Zimbabwe: Charcoal — Energy consumption
Peru
5,750 TJ
in 2024
Zimbabwe
4,682 TJ
in 2024
Peru rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Charcoal — Energy consumption over time
- Peru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Peru currently reports 5,750 TJ against 4,682 TJ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,068 TJ.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 180 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,274 TJ | 413 TJ | 1,861 TJ | Peru |
| 2000s | 5,892 TJ | 1,394 TJ | 4,498 TJ | Peru |
| 2010s | 6,153 TJ | 4,194 TJ | 1,959 TJ | Peru |
| 2020s | 5,795 TJ | 4,607 TJ | 1,188 TJ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charcoal — energy consumption, Peru or Zimbabwe?
- Peru, at 5,750 TJ against 4,682 TJ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charcoal — energy consumption between Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 1,068 TJ, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for charcoal — energy consumption?
- Peru ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Charcoal — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.