Kiribati vs Romania: Charcoal — Energy production
Charcoal — Energy production over time
- Kiribati
- Romania
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 13.28 TJ against 9.65 TJ in Romania, a difference of 3.63 TJ.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.4 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Kiribati ranks 124th and Romania ranks 127th of 148 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.25 TJ | 1,169 TJ | 1,162 TJ | Romania |
| 2000s | 8.94 TJ | 1,084 TJ | 1,075 TJ | Romania |
| 2010s | 11.24 TJ | 272.39 TJ | 261.15 TJ | Romania |
| 2020s | 12.94 TJ | 27.54 TJ | 14.59 TJ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charcoal — energy production, Kiribati or Romania?
- Kiribati, at 13.28 TJ against 9.65 TJ in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charcoal — energy production between Kiribati and Romania?
- 3.63 TJ, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Romania rank globally for charcoal — energy production?
- Kiribati ranks 124th and Romania ranks 127th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Charcoal — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.