Barbados vs Madagascar: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Barbados
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Madagascar
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Barbados rank
119th
Madagascar rank
117th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Barbados
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Barbados, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 119th and Madagascar ranks 117th of 172 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0013 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Barbados or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Barbados and Madagascar?
- 0 t per person, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Madagascar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Madagascar rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Barbados ranks 119th and Madagascar ranks 117th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.