Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Bhutan
0 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
132nd
Zimbabwe rank
135th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 172 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?
- Bhutan, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.