Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Brazil
0.0007 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
73rd
Kazakhstan rank
72nd
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Brazil, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 73rd and Kazakhstan ranks 72nd of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0017 t per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0017 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0014 t per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0 t per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Brazil or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Brazil and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Kazakhstan rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 73rd and Kazakhstan ranks 72nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.