Ghana vs Kazakhstan: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Ghana
0.0007 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
75th
Kazakhstan rank
72nd
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Ghana, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 75th and Kazakhstan ranks 72nd of 172 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Ghana or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Ghana and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Kazakhstan rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 75th and Kazakhstan ranks 72nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.