Japan vs Latvia: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Japan
0.0085 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0089 t per person
in 2024
Japan rank
39th
Latvia rank
36th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0089 t per person against 0.0085 t per person in Japan, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 36th of 172 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0215 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0212 t per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0147 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0147 t per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0116 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0113 t per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0099 t per person | 0.004 t per person | 0.0059 t per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Japan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0089 t per person against 0.0085 t per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Japan and Latvia?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Japan ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 36th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.