Kazakhstan vs Oman: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Oman
0.001 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
72nd
Oman rank
70th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.001 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oman ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 72nd and Oman ranks 70th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0 t per person | Oman |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0 t per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Kazakhstan or Oman?
- Oman, at 0.001 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Oman rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 72nd and Oman ranks 70th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.