Oman vs Uruguay: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Oman
0.001 t per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0012 t per person
in 2024
Oman rank
70th
Uruguay rank
67th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Oman
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Oman, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Oman ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 67th of 172 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0042 t per person | 0.004 t per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0041 t per person | 0.004 t per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Oman or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Oman and Uruguay?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Uruguay rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Oman ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 67th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.