Australia vs Madagascar: Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Madagascar
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
78th
Madagascar rank
79th
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Madagascar, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 78th and Madagascar ranks 79th of 171 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Australia or Madagascar?
- Australia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Australia and Madagascar?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Madagascar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Madagascar rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 78th and Madagascar ranks 79th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.