What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import value, per capita between Japan and United Kingdom?

0.0002 1000 USD per person, with United Kingdom ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom?

57 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Japan vs United Kingdom: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita

Japan

0.0072 1000 USD per person

in 2024

United Kingdom

0.0074 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Japan rank

34th

United Kingdom rank

32nd

Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita over time

Japan
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.0074 1000 USD per person against 0.0072 1000 USD per person in Japan, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1968 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Japan ranks 34th and United Kingdom ranks 32nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Japan	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0009 1000 USD per person	0.0046 1000 USD per person	0.0038 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
1970s	0.0023 1000 USD per person	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0061 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
1980s	0.008 1000 USD per person	0.0134 1000 USD per person	0.0055 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
1990s	0.0114 1000 USD per person	0.0156 1000 USD per person	0.0042 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
2000s	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0127 1000 USD per person	0.0044 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
2010s	0.0084 1000 USD per person	0.0099 1000 USD per person	0.0015 1000 USD per person	United Kingdom
2020s	0.0081 1000 USD per person	0.0073 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import value, per capita, Japan or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 0.0074 1000 USD per person against 0.0072 1000 USD per person in Japan as of 2024.
What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import value, per capita between Japan and United Kingdom?: 0.0002 1000 USD per person, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2024.
How do Japan and United Kingdom rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import value, per capita?: Japan ranks 34th and United Kingdom ranks 32nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs United Kingdom: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-capita/japan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-capita/japan/united-kingdom/">Japan vs United Kingdom: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 6,453 data points, 1968–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Chemical wood pulp — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.