How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uruguay?

56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Uruguay: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre

Brazil

0.0178 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

0.0177 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

94th

Uruguay rank

95th

Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre over time

Brazil
Uruguay

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0178 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0177 1000 USD per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Uruguay ahead.

Brazil ranks 94th and Uruguay ranks 95th of 171 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.009 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0085 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
1970s	0.0034 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0172 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0138 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
1980s	0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0221 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0197 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
1990s	0.0107 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0326 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
2000s	0.0224 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0471 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0247 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
2010s	0.0309 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0552 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0243 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay
2020s	0.0169 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0299 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0131 1000 USD per square kilometre	Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre, Brazil or Uruguay?: Brazil, at 0.0178 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0177 1000 USD per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre between Brazil and Uruguay?: 0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uruguay?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Uruguay rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre?: Brazil ranks 94th and Uruguay ranks 95th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Uruguay: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-square-kilometre/brazil/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-square-kilometre/brazil/uruguay/">Brazil vs Uruguay: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 6,278 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Chemical wood pulp — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.