Guatemala vs United States: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.3277 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.3803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
44th
United States rank
42nd

Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • United States
00.10.20.30.40.5196819952023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.3803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3277 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0526 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 44th and United States ranks 42nd of 171 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala United States Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0072 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0359 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
1970s 0.0308 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0921 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0613 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
1980s 0.043 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1917 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1487 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
1990s 0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2612 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2507 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
2000s 0.0091 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2982 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.289 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
2010s 0.047 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3328 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2858 1000 USD per square kilometre United States
2020s 0.1771 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3838 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2067 1000 USD per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre, Guatemala or United States?
United States, at 0.3803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3277 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre between Guatemala and United States?
0.0526 1000 USD per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United States?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and United States rank globally for chemical wood pulp — import value, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 44th and United States ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs United States: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-import-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/united-states/">Guatemala vs United States: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,278 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Chemical wood pulp — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.