Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value

Australia
30,573 1000 USD
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 1000 USD
in 2024
Australia rank
12th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
14th

Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value over time

  • Australia
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196819962024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 30,573 1000 USD against 2 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 30,571 1000 USD.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th of 144 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 18,581 1000 USD 13 1000 USD 18,568 1000 USD Australia
2010s 25,593 1000 USD 6.4 1000 USD 25,587 1000 USD Australia
2020s 33,267 1000 USD 2 1000 USD 33,265 1000 USD Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — import value, Australia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia, at 30,573 1000 USD against 2 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — import value between Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
30,571 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — import value?
Australia ranks 12th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-sulphate-unbleached-import-value/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chemical-wood-pulp-sulphate-unbleached-import-value/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chemical wood pulp, sulphate, unbleached — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
187 places, 6,528 data points, 1968–2024
Last refreshed

The database contains data on the production and trade in roundwood and in primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world.The main types of primary forest products included in this database are roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further and defined in the Joint Forest Sector Questionnaire (JFSQ) (https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en). The database contains details of the following topics: - roundwood removals (production) by coniferous and non-coniferous wood and assortments, - production and trade in industrial roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, wood charcoal, pulp, paper and paperboard, and other products. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en